The consultation about the draft Old Oak Common and Park Royal Opportunity Area Planning Framework (OAPF) closed on 14 April 2015.
The London Tenants Federation (supported by a grant from the Trust for London) with members of Just Space have been assisting local communities in and around the OO&PR Opportunity Area who have come together to form the Grand Union Alliance (GUA). There have been a number of meetings of local groups and members of the public, including a Community Conference, which have generated the wide ranging views and comments contained in the ‘compendium’ below. This is substantially the product of local people – that is apart from the editing process to collate the product into an orderly submission. The document is a faithful summation of their comments prompted by scrutiny of the OAPF draft. The GUA did not make a collective response to the draft Framework but elements of the compendium and of a standard template were used by individual members and groups in their separate submissions.
Responses from other Just Space organisations are posted here too. Continue reading
The London Forum of Civic and Amenity Societies (LFCAS – which is a member of Just Space) has a lot of useful updates in its Spring Newsforum [ download here ] including commentary on the Inspector’s report on the London Plan Examination in Public last year, news of rapid changes at Finsbury Park and other items.
Just Space took part in an important Local Plan examination, March 3 – 12, bringing together community groups and individuals from Stratford and Hackney Wick to challenge and try to improve the LLDC’s new Local Plan policy. The London Legacy Development Corporation is the Mayor’s planning authority for an extended area around the Olympic Park. Continue reading
Saturday 28 March: there will be a day-workshop on neighbourhood planning presented by Just Space neighbourhood groups which have been working with UCL students and staff. The workshop will take place in Mile End. Details, programme and (free) booking at http://wp.me/PGovO-7G
There have been press stories today from Cannes reporting that the Mayor of London has announced (at MIPIM) an ambitious new London Plan. In fact what has happened is that the Further Alterations to the London Plan (#FALP14) which were debated in last year’s public hearings – EiP – have finally been integrated with previous versions and published. This is now the operative London Plan and can be downloaded from the City Hall web site http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/london-plan/further-alterations-to-the-london-plan
Work is starting on a complete review of the London Plan (and Just Space plans a conference in the summer on what it should contain). Meanwhile a further set of minor alterations is expected to be published for consultation immediately after the UK general election in May 2015.
The GLA is preparing to issue a consultation draft of Supplementary Planning Guidance on Housing. Just Space was invited to a meeting to comment on what the planners are preparing.
Just Space is in difficulty commenting because an SPG is supposed to elaborate policies already established in the London Plan, not make or modify policy. Since many of the housing policies contained in the London Plan have been fiercely and consistently opposed by Just Space and its member organisations, commenting is almost impossible. One member describes it as ‘embroidering the emperor’s new clothes’ and there is mention of deckchairs on the titanic. All we can do is to welcome the positive elements and seek to mitigate the worst impacts of the Mayor’s policies.
Just Space looks forward to commenting in detail on the Draft SPG, publication of which is expected on 11 May, just after the General Election (when the next round of draft Alterations to the London Plan are also expected).
Meanwhile, here are the Just Space comments submitted today.
In response to the Mayor’s consultation on a draft Opportunity Area Planning Framework (OAPF) for the City Fringe, Just Space submitted a short comment, supporting the Mayor’s evident attempt to limit the damage to local economic activities from the voracious demands of residential development, but highly critical of the procedures being followed in the planning process. The full statement is here