Category: Uncategorized

  • sale of the century: Minister & Mayor’s DeputIES SMOOTH privatisATION OF public land

    sale of the century: Minister & Mayor’s DeputIES SMOOTH privatisATION OF public land

    Minister for Planning Matthew Pennycook MP joined Jules Pipe, London’s Deputy Mayor for Planning, and Tom Copley, London’s Deputy Mayor for Housing, to announce yet more gifts to developers to increase their bank balances

    The three people charged with responsibility for responding to the housing affordability crisis in London – and the plight of hundreds of thousands of homeless families and children, as well as the entire planning system – met with thousands of developers and assorted hucksters in the UK’s largest sale of public land in the UK at Leeds earlier this month, known as UKREiiF.

    The three politicians were there to explain to their wealthy hosts that the next London Plan will be “streamlined”, jettisoning numerous detailed policies and protections, in an effort to make profitable development easier.

    Developers have consistently insisted that the minimum 20% profit which they expect on all projects is jeopardised by requirements to build safe and useful homes. They are particularly annoyed by the Mayor’s attempt to get even a meagre proportion of affordable housing: but they are also keen on removing high standards of quality (such as dual aspect homes, essential in the current heatwave) and post-Grenfell safety requirements.

    The Deputy Mayor said that the London Plan would reduce and simplify the rules for developers, making schemes more profitable. The oligarchic housebuilders – who control much identified housing land in London, which they leave empty to keep house prices high – have almost stopped building over the past 18 months, in order to clear the glut of inappropriate yet expensive 1 and 2 bed which they insist on building.

    The government blames the Mayor and boroughs for demanding too much from developers and not meeting the government’s imposed target of 88,000 newly built homes a year, a level of build which has never been achieved in the past 100 years.

    Jules Pipe explained on behalf of the Mayor that the new London Plan will be “clearer and easier to navigate for the housing industry and councils, stripping away duplication and simplifying policies that have been interpreted oppressively by boroughs”.

    Mr Pipe claimed that “building more homes, particularly social and affordable homes, is a top priority for the Mayor. It’s a moral duty for us all to tackle the crisis in
    homelessness and make housing more affordable for working Londoners” although he promised no new public funds for the essential social infrastructure of council housing; nor did he propose any pressure on the oligarchic landbanking housebuilders to build out the 500,000 homes for which they already have permission.

    At the conference, Deputy Mayor for Housing Copley claimed that new powers secured through the English Devolution and Community Act passed last month will allow City Hall a lower threshold for calling in applications. It will also give the Mayor renewed powers to grant planning permission through Mayoral Development Orders. It is understood that officials have been instructed to scope out major brownfield sites near transport hubs that could benefit from this.

    Minister Matthew Pennycook concluded that “the case for fundamentally transforming the housing system that we inherited is unarguable. By any metric, it has been an abject failure” – but then promised more of the same “build, build, build” policies pursued by the previous Conservative government, but with rocket boosters attached.

  • New councils form

    New councils form

    A Just Space members meeting on 19 May discussed the novel and complex process under way in many of the London boroughs as Labour cedes seats but tries not to cede control. Members reported on the coalition-building prospects for a number of boroughs and we shall be adding links to useful analysis as we come accross it. Do use the comments below if you have suggestions.

    It is enormously important that we get copies of the Alternative Plan for London as a Caring City in to the hands and minds of newly elected councillors. Members went away with bags full of copies.

    The discussion was introduced by a short talk from Michael Ball, coordinator.
    Download his slides here which contain valuable results, data and maps.

    At the end of the week, in which all the bargaining between party groups was completed, the Prime Minister surprised us by banning Labour Councillors from doing deals with Greens

    The meeting also heard and discussed a talk by Sarah Goldzweig on the third anniversary of POP – Protect Our Places – a campaign to defend valued community services, including traditional retail markets, many of whom are Just Space members. Download PDF.

  • New NPPF – worse than ever

    New NPPF – worse than ever

    10 March 2026 Just Space has submitted strong objection to the government’s proposed draft NPPF

    “… by appearing to destroy the core mechanisms at the heart of planning since 1947, it is an intensely disturbing document that seems contemptuous of planning itself. It certainly goes far further even than the previous Tory government in its utter determination to wreck the cornerstone of the planning system, local decision-making.”

    Download the full Just Space response.

    Thanks to Southwark Law Centre for their work in the following briefing, circulated earlier:
    https://justspace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NPPF-Consultation-2026-JS-Briefing.

    Government proposals:

    National Planning Policy Framework: proposed reforms and other changes to the planning system – GOV.UK

    Other organisations’ responses: (thanks for sharing them, especially to Duncan Bowie.)
    Highbury Group on Housing Delivery
    Housing Forum NPPF-consultation-response-from-The-Housing-Forum.pdf
    RTPI response to the proposed reforms to the National Planning Policy Framework and other changes to the planning system | Championing the power of planning
    CIH responds to the National Planning Policy Framework consultation (December 2025)
    LGA submission to MHCLG NPPF reforms consultation March 2026.pdf
    British Property Federation
    London Forum
    London Councils
    HBF
    NPPF Changes | London Assembly
    Stephen Hill
    Community Land Trusts Network
    Community Planning Alliance

  • Too biased, too late

    Too biased, too late

    The GLA’s plans for the impact appraisal of the next London Plan are strongly criticised by Just Space and many of its member organisations.

    If the GLA were serious about impact they would have started their analysis right at the beginning of making the plan. Then the assessments could alert them to bad policies with likely poor outcomes and could test improvements. In fact this Impact Assessment has yet to start and plan making is well under way.

    The GLA has been consulting on the scope and design of the Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) and we find it to be weak in many respects and biased in ways which would make it blind to the downsides of many controversial policies. Policies will gain plus points for growth and plus points for almost all extra density. How can density policy and tall building policy be evaluated if increases in density are the measuring rod for success?

    Another weakness of the approach is the lack of analysis of why earlier plans have failed – especially failed over 25 years to produce anything like enough low-rent social housing. The need for it is unchallenged but the backlog of unmet need mounts. Without much better monitoring, evaluation and explanation it will be next to impossible for the Assessment to point towards better policies.

    Many of the criticisms of the London development process come down to the effects of prioritising developer and land owner profits in the assessment of projects, captured in the phrase ‘subject to viability’ and its application to everything in the plan.

    Is there no alternative? The regulations require a strategic assessment of the plan against reasonable alternatives which have been explicitly or implicitly rejected. Just Space is working on an Alternative Plan for London which differs radically from the Mayor’s and the GLA has no excuse for not exploring some of the main alternatives that Londoners call for: less pressure for growth, a more polycentric metropolitan region with less need to travel, more care and support for existing enterprise.

    Read our consultation response in detail. Download here.It has been prepared by a group of JustSpace members and others have been consulted on drafts. Particularly valuable inputs have come from the Southwark Law Centre.

    CPRE London has submitted a strong critique aimed at evaluation professionals. Reading it is educational. Download here.

    For the previous London Plan City Hall planners got the IIA seriously wrong and were required to go back and do a lot of extra work. Earlier posts have the details.

  • EstateWatch at City Hall

    EstateWatch at City Hall

    Speakers from a number of threatened estates testified to the injustices and miseries increasingly imposed on tenants and residents as the increasingly profit-driven ‘regeneration’ machine operates across the city. Tenants from the Lesnes Estate at Thamsmead, Brick Lane, Aylesbury, West Kentish Town and many others spoke, as did Joseph Jones from the London tenants Federation and Richard Lee from Just Space – the 2 organisations which set up and manage the EstateWatch.London web site.

    A detailed write-up including the many round-table discussions among the 100 or so participants will be posted here when it is available. Here is an account from Focus E15 including the speech of Joseph Jones of LTF.

    Richard Lee of Just Space said “The question for our tables to discuss is about the resources and practical measures that are needed to protect tenants whose estates are under threat.  

    Knowledge about housing and planning is central to this, as we have heard, but other types of knowledge are very important too.  Tenants need to know their rights and have access to legal advice.  They also need to know about tools they can use to make the case for an alternative to demolition, such as retrofit surveys and trauma informed practice as part of a community health impact assessment.  

    Most of us here need more support to be able to do the above, but what about tenants on estates who are not here!   We very much need resources for an outreach programme.  How can the London Assembly support this?  Where else do we go for resources and how do we coordinate this?  Coordination of our activities is a big issue.  Zoe has brought us together today, but we need a space that brings us together more often.  We are asked today to give our ideas for policy change but without resourcing communities on the ground, good policies will never be put into practice.” 

    A group of students at the Bartlett School of Planning at UCL have been working with EstateWatch.London to update the web site and have prepared a leaflet suitable for use in door-to-door canvassing on estates. A copy can be downloaded from here for you to print:
    https://justspace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/FinalJustSpaceGuideLeaflet.pdf

    Also available is the full report by EstateWatch, Alternative Good Practice Guide to Estate Regeneration.

  • Will the impact studies be good enough?

    Will the impact studies be good enough?

    The GLA is required to do a whole series of impact studies as they prepare the draft London Plan – to alert them to bad impacts and highlight scope for improvements. They are also required to consult the public about the scope of the studies they plan to do. The consultation about this draft Scoping Report could have been done months or a year ago but finally it is happening now.

    The consultation was badly announced just before christmas and with very short notice for responses. We protested strongly and the GLA has extended the consultation until 13 February.

    All responses must be made in writing to londonplan@london.gov.uk and Just Space will be compiling a collective response. Individuals and groups are also encouraged to respond.

    The Just Space response will be coordinated by Michael Edwards, Jed Holloway and others. Please get in touch if you want to contribute. A first reaction by Jed Holloway is here to download. A later composite draft response is added here 9 February. Do use any or all of it in your own.

    The Draft Scoping Study for the Integrated Impact Assessment can be found at https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/planning/london-plan/towards-new-london-plan-consultation

    The Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) covers requirements relating to Sustainability Appraisal (SA)/Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), Equality Impact Assessment (EqIA), Health Impact Assessment (HIA), and Community Safety Assessment (CSA). It proceeds by defining the objectives against which the plan should be judged, then sub-objectives and detailed questions. It should deal with alternatives.

    Our previous experience in 2019 was shocking. The Panel of Inspectors at the Examination in Public were persuaded by us that the draft IIA was of such inadequacy that the London Plan team were required to produce additional appraisals of the impact each and every policy in the draft plan would have on each of the groups protected in the Equality Act. Links to back story in our post of 5 January.

    (Page amended 26 January to add the download link to Jed Holloway’s text)

  • Object now to the Mayor’s cave-in

    Object now to the Mayor’s cave-in

    Despite 90,000 homeless children and 300,000 people on housing waiting lists across London, Mayor Sadiq Khan is consulting on proposals to reduce the amount of affordable and social rent housing developers are required to provide!  The government is consulting on related proposals to let some developers make less contributions to local infrastructure.

    The consultation on a package of measures to help developers ends this Thurs 22nd Jan – and we’re urging everyone to submit a strong objection. 

     Attached are two briefings:
    A simple briefing explaining the GLA City Hall proposals and how to object
    A briefing on the MHCLG consulttaion on reducing CIL and increasing the Mayor’s powers.

    Later (22 January): the deadline is tonight. Here are more submissions which you may find stimulating as you prepare your own comments:
    Michael Edwards
    Robin Brown
    Highbury Group to GLA
    Highbury Group to MHCLG
    HBF to GLA
    HBF to MHCLG
    London Forum to MHCLG
    London Forum to GLA
    Zoẽ Garbett AM

    Next day comes a brilliant article in the Financial Times by Britain’s best housing journaliist Pete Apps. It’s not about the London proposals but a broad welcome to the slowdown in housebuilding and falling prices. This could be the beginning of the end of house prices escalation. If you are able to read this article, do.

  • Our protest to the Mayor succeeds

    Our protest to the Mayor succeeds

    Our protest to the Mayor on 7 January (text below) must have shamed them into a re-think. The consultation was yesterday extended to 13 February. Thank you.

    Dear Sadiq (copied to Assembly Members in the Planning Committee) 7/1/26

    We wish to register our outrage at the unacceptable consultation timetable on the Integrated Impact Assessment Scoping Report, and request it be extended for 3 weeks.

    As you know, you are legally required to consult on a draft of how to evaluate the impact of a new London Plan. The London Plan team began consultations on a new London Plan in 2023, at which point we requested consultation on the IIA scoping. We have repeated this request several times in the intervening two years, and submitted extensive evidence on this matter in response to ‘Towards a new London Plan’ last June, when we asked “is inclusion an illusion?”

    We were reassured that there would be consultation on the IIA scoping “later this year”. We learnt only yesterday that just such a consultation purportedly began on 19th Dec 2025, running for 6 weeks, with a closing date for comments 30th January 2026.

    None of us or our extensive network of community groups were notified of this consultation – indeed I spoke to CPRE London this morning who were completely unaware. It would appear from their website that the London Forum of Civic & Amenity Societies remain similarly uninformed.

    To slip out under cover of the Christmas break such an important consultation does not demonstrate a commitment to equalities. To slip it out without even notifying many of London’s longstanding networks and organisations runs counter to your claim on the landing page for this consultation: “I want to forge a new consensus on planning that’s fit for 21st century London”.

    This is particularly inauspicious given our previous experience in 2019, when the Panel of Inspectors at the Examination in Public were persuaded by us that the draft IIA was of such inadequacy that the London Plan team were required to produce additional appraisals of the impact each and every policy in the draft plan.

    We share your aspiration to forge a new consensus, and urgently request that you extend this consultation by 3 weeks in order to cover the time wasted by failing to inform London’s communities of this important consultation and thereby reaffirm your commitment to equality, transparency and consensus.

    Yours sincerely. Michael Ball, Just Space Co-ordinator

    Links to back story in our post of 5 January

  • Mayor buries consultation…

    Mayor buries consultation…

    5 January 2026 The Mayor is legally required to consult on a draft of how they plan to evaluate the next London Plan. They have been postponing the consultation for a year or more and now they have slipped it out under cover of Christmas. Consultation closes at the end of January so nearly half of the period has expired already. We interrupt our work on the alternative plan to alert Londoners to the need for urgent action.

    The Draft Scoping Study for the Integrated Impact Assessment can be found at https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/planning/london-plan/towards-new-london-plan-consultation

    We have no trace of receiving any notification about this, despite us being on the Mayor’s email lists for updates. We discovered today 5 January from a friend who had received an email on 23rd December, telling them that the consultation had started on 19th December. This is very bad practice indeed.

    Those who weren’t around in 2016 may be interested to know that the London Plan team initially worked well with Just Space and community groups on the Integrated Impact Analysis for the current (2021) London Plan. [ link ] We failed to agree, however and they went ahead with a process which we considered seriously inadequate. In the event their analysis of impact on inequality was so weak that we persuaded the Panel of Inspectors to insist on more work; then the further work was found still quite inadequate and the London Plan team were sent away by the Inspectors to attempt an appraisal of how each policy in the plan would likely affect each of the sections of the population. The resulting report confirmed our worst fears about the inability of the plan policies to arrest the growth of inequality or reverse it. But it was by then too late to influence the content of the plan. Catch up with that story here: https://justspace.org.uk/2019/04/28/actual-equalities-study-at-last/

    ‘The IIA includes Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Assessment (SA/SEA), Health Impact Assessment (HIA), Community Safety Impact Assessment (CSA), and Equalities Impact Assessment (EqIA). In addition, information from the parallel workstream of the Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA) will inform this IIA but be reported separately.’

    Individuals and groups concerned about the equality and/or environmental impacts of the Plan are urged to read the scoping report (link above) and comment to us so we can prepare a collective response to City Hall before the end of January. If we can, we’ll organise a briefing between now and then.

  • Post Title

    Post Title

    Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacijghlkjfhdglkdsjfh nia odio sem nec elit. Maecenas faucibus mollis interdum. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam.

    This is a heading

    Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Maecenas faucibus mollis interdum. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam.
    jkfdhg lkdjfhg lkjdfhg lskdjfgh lskdjfhgl kdfjhg lkdfjghl dkjfgh lkdfjg h
    khgkjhg kjhg

    skjdhfg lkjdhf lkjhdfglkjhdfglkjdfhgl kjfhdg
    dhfkljsdhf kjdfhglkjsdfhg lkjdfhg lkjdfhg lkjdfhg lkjfdgh lkjdfhg

    Sub heading

    ONE, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit.

    Maecenas faucibus mollis interdum. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur et. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam.

    Type your caption here

    Today maybeThis afternoon will be breezy, with cloud continuing to move in from the west bringing some patchy spells of rain with it.

    Tonight
    Tonight will see outbreaks of rain and showers early diminish later leaving it drier with clear spells. It will start breezy but winds will diminish somewhat later.

    Wednesday
    Tomorrow is expected to be largely dry with a mixture of sunny spells and variable cloud through the day. Breezes continuing to ease away. A warmer day.

    Outlook for Thursday to Saturday
    Thursday looks to be a dry day with partly cloudy skies. A sunny evening. Friday will see sunshine and passing cloud, some bringing the odd shower. Trending warmer by Friday. Saturday will be an unsettled day with showers that will be heavy and thundery at times.

    asdfgsdfgsdfg

    Sub heading